Bittu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3773 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2019 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan ====================================================== BITTU KUMAR SINGH S/o Radhakishun Singh R/o village- Semaria, P.S.- Nautan, District- Siwan, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prashant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 114/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that admittedly the allegation is against unknown persons, but the police authorities of Nautan police station has falsely implicated the present petitioner on the basis of suspicion and there is no recovery from the petitioner. It is further submitted that the entire allegations are imaginary.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 3773 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 114/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and also the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T