Munchun Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29511 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -237 Year- 2013 Thana -WARSALIGANJ District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Munchun Singh, son of Late Brijnandan Singh,

2. Tripurari Singh, son of Jawahar Singh, both resident of village- Pijari, P.S. - Barbigha, District - Shekhpura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3/ 29-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302, 201, 120-B/34 Indian Penal Code. Considering that apart from suspicion there is no direct material against the Petitioners, let them be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/-(Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge, Nawada, in connection with Warsaliganj P.S. Case No.237 of 2013, subject to the conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners and another bailor shall be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29511 of 2014 (3) dt.29-01-2015 2/2 father/brother/mother/sister of the Petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T