Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26508 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2015 Thana -ROH District- NAWADA ====================================================== Ravi Kumar, son of Pano Singh, resident of Village Karanpur @ Kanarpur, Police Station Govindpur, District Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in a case registered under Sections 304/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(V) of the S.C./S.T. Act.

The prosecution case, in brief, as alleged by the informant, is that on 11.3.2015, on the advice of the petitioner, informant had admitted her husband in Ashirwad Nursing Home, where her husband had been operated upon by the Doctor for Hernia, for which she had deposited Rs.7,000/-. She has further alleged that Dr. Arvind Raj and Dr. R.L. Choudhary had operated her husband at about 2.30 P.M. and thereafter her husband had not got conscious and on 12.3.2015 when the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26508 of 2015 (2) dt.27-07-2015 2/2 doctor demanded more money, the informant went home and brought money by 12 P.M. by which time her husband regained consciousness but was not feeling well and there was no Doctor to attend him and in the meantime, her husband died. On behalf of the petitioner, it is submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 4.4.2015 and charge sheet has been submitted in the case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedents. As per the allegation, it is submitted that no offence under Section 304 I.P.C. is made out against the petitioner.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Roh P.S. Case No.19 of 2015.

(Sudhir Singh, J) PNM U T