Prabhu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6010 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2025 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Prabhu Paswan Son of Late Tribeni Paswan Resident of Village- Diyadipur, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aman Vishal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard Mr. Aman Vishal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 219 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the daughter of the informant, namely, Puja Kumari (deceased) was married nine years ago to one Vipin Paswan. It is alleged that her in-laws have killed her.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner is father-in-law. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6010 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 nature of allegation is general and omnibus. He also submits that the husband, against whom the main thrust of the allegation is already in custody. He also submits that the mother-in-law of the deceased has already been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 63680 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 15.06.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad(Bihar) in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 219 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T