Vijay Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2710 of 2020 ====================================================== VIJAY KUMAR MAHTO Son of Sunardev Mahto, Resident of VillageJalhan, Police Station- Sangrampur, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran.

5.

The District Education Officer, Motihari, East Champaran. 6.

The District Programme Officer(Establishment), East Champaran. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Sangrampur Block, East Champaran. 8.

The Block Education Officer, Sangrampur Block, East Champaran. 9.

The Secretary, District Teacher Appellate Authority,East Champaran. 10.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bariyaria Tola Rajpur, Sangrampur Block, East Champaran.

11.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Bariyaria Tola Rajpur, Sangrampur Block, East Champaran.

12.

Md. Serajuddin Ansari, Son of Habibullah Mian, Resident of Village- North Bhawanipur, Police Station- Sangrampur , East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Radha Mohan Singh, Advocate Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mrs. Binita Singh (Sc28) For respondent no.12 :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-03-2025 Heard Mr.Radha Mohan Singh along with Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mrs. Binita Singh, learned SC 28 for the State and Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.12.

2. Petitioner is satisfied as his grievance has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.2710 of 2020(7) dt.03-03-2025 2/2 redressed by Mr. Saheb Alam, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), East Champaran, Motihari as he has taken all effort at his own level to consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law. His action is appreciated.

3. Considering the information contained in the supplementary counter affidavit, the present writ petition is disposed of.

4. Interlocutory Application (s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U