← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1499/2025disposed

Ram Krishna Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-30Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1499 of 2025 ====================================================== Ram Krishna Pandey son of Shri Ram Kailash Pandey, resident of village Prashastdih, Post Office - Prashastdih, Police Station - Sabaur, and DistrictBhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of HRD, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

3.

The District Education Officer, Bhagalpur.

4.

The District Program Officer, (Establishment), Bhagalpur. 5.

The Block Education Officer, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur. 6.

In-Charge Head Master, Madhya Vidayalaya, Prashstdih, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash Chandra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, AC to GP-22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.The present writ application is filed for the following reliefs:

(i) For direction to the respondent authorities to accept the joining of petitioner as Exclusive Teacher [Vishisht Sikshak (ID No. ETBНА 12422559311)] from the date of his joining i.e. 01.01.2025 because he has passed/qualified the eligibility test, 2024 conducted by Bihar School Examination Board vide Memo No. PR34/2024, under Bihar School Exclusive Teachers Rule, 2023 and Bihar School Exclusive

Patna High Court CWJC No.1499 of 2025(2) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 Teachers (Amended) Rule, 2024.

ii. For direction to the respondents to grant grade pay of trained scale to the petitioner with effect from the date of obtaining "Diploma in Primary Education" (DPE) from IGNOU.

(iii)For any further relief/reliefs, direction/directions, or order/orders which are found admissible during the course of arguments.

3.Considering the reliefs mentioned in the writ application, I direct the petitioner to file a detailed representation within two weeks before the District Education Officer, Bhagalpur (respondent no.3) and respondent no.3 would be obliged to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

4. It is made clear that this Court may take serious view against the concerned respondent if the order is not complied within the stipulated period.

5. With the aforesaid direction, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U