Dr. Pankaj Kumar v. The Magadh University,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2826 of 2019 ====================================================== Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Son of Late Aditya Singh, Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Ganga Devi Mahila College, Kankarbagh, Patna800020 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Magadh university, Bodh Gaya, through its Registrar District -Gaya 2.

The Vice Chancellor, Magadh university Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya 3.

The Registrar, Magadh university, Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya 4.

Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District-Gaya 5.

The Patliputra University, Patna Through its Registrar, District-Patna 6.

The Vice Chancellor, Patliputra University, Patna 7.

The Registrar, Patliputra University, Patna 8.

The Finance Officer, Patliputra University, Patna 9.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 10.

The Director, Higher Education, Deptt. Of Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 11.

Authorized Officer, Pay Verification Cell, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 12.

The Principal,Tribeni Sayabhama College, Hasua, District- Nawadah 13.

The Principal, Ganga Devi Mahila College, Kankarbagh, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Purushottam Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Subash Chandra Mishra (Sc16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-09-2019 The present case has been listed under the heading "To Be Mentioned" for correction of details of respondent nos. 1, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 11 respectively.

The error is attributed on account of wrong entry made by the N.I.C.

In view of the above, the N.I.C. is directed to make

Patna High Court CWJC No.2826 of 2019(4) dt.03-09-2019 2/2 necessary correction in the details of respondent nos. 1, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 11 at the earliest.

In the meanwhile, the office is also directed to make necessary correction in the details respondent nos. 1, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 11 as per set out in the writ petition.

In 2nd paragraph of order dated 27.06.2019 at page no.2, instead of Annexure-3, it has wrongly been typed as Annexure-2. The same may be read as Annexure-3, in place of Annexure-2.

Order dated 27.06.2019 is modified to the extent mentioned above.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U