← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/5049/2018disposed

Gopal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

2023-05-10Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5049 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16515 of 2014 ====================================================== Gopal Prasad, S/o Late Bhujawan Ram, Resident of Mohalla- R Block, Road No.-3, Behind Garage, Police Station- Sachiwalaya, Town and District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Bihar. 2.

Sri Upendra Narayan, The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Commissioner-cumSpecial Secretary, Building Construction Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

Sri Kashyap Kumar Gupta, The Chief Engineer (South), Building Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

4.

Sri Amrit Ram, The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, South Bihar Circle, Patna.

5.

Sri Madan Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Patna Division, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Alleging non-compliance of this Court's order dated 03.07.2018 passed in CWJC No. 16515 of 2014, the present contempt application has been filed.

Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that order dated 28.03.2023 (Annexure A to 2nd Supplementary show-cause) has been passed by the authorities in compliance of the writ Court's order.

In view of the substantial compliance, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in the contempt proceedings.

Patna High Court MJC No.5049 of 2018(12) dt.10-05-2023 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, submits that the order does not take care of the petitioner's grievance. He, therefore, may assail the order in appropriate proceedings. With liberty to assail the order in appropriate proceedings, the application is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Sumit/ShashankU