Lallu Yadav @ Lalu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3174 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2019 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West Champaran ====================================================== LALLU YADAV @ LALU YADAV Son of Sri Adya Yadav Resident of Village - Siswa, P.S.- Chautarwa, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Renuka Ratnakar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case No.266 of 2019 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per allegation 500 ml of country made liquor was recovered from dickey of the motorcycle. It is alleged that motorcycle was used by Petitioner, Lallu Yadav. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is nothing incriminating has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. He was falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3174 of 2020(2) dt.28-02-2020 2/2 well as nature of accusation, in the event his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise , West Champaran at Bettiah in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case No.266 of 2019 on the following conditions:

"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the tiral and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) SUMIT/- U T