Jitu @ Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5313 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-493 Year-2022 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ====================================================== Jitu @ Jitendra Yadav S/o Rupa Yadav R/o Village- Nichali Bazar Giriyak, P.S.- Giriyak, Distt- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in the present case is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case No. 493 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a/26/27 of the Arms Act. He has got four criminal antecedents. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he repeatedly fired from his pistol to threatened the informant as he reported about the his illicit trade of liquor.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the cartridges recovered from the spot.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5313 of 2023(2) dt.16-05-2023 2/2 Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case wherein there is a specific allegation against the petitioner that he was repeatedly firing from his pistol and the seizure list available on the record shows recovery of cartridges from the spot, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is, thus, refused.

This application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U T