← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3234/2025disposed

Nirmala Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-27Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3234 of 2025 ====================================================== Nirmala Devi Wife of Sanjay Singh, Resident of Village- Raghubirgardh, Anchal- 2 P.S. Chainpur, District Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

The Director of Education, Secondary, Bihar at Patna. 3.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, region- Patna, Bihar at Patna. 4.

The District Education Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua. 5.

The District Program Officer, Establishment, Bhabua. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabua. 7.

The Secretary of Appointment Unit cum Prakhand Panchayat Raj Officer, Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.

8.

The Headmaster of Utkramit Middle School, Gulariya, Chainpur, DistrictKaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Additional Advocate General (7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

"For issuance a writ, order or direction including a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the salary of the petitioner since 27.12.2023 to till today and arrear of salary with interest may be paid in favour of the petitioner and may be pass other and further order which the petitioner is entitled to."

Patna High Court CWJC No.3234 of 2025(2) dt.27-02-2025 2/2

3. Considering the relief(s) sought by the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation before the Respondent No. 4 along with all supporting documents within a period of four weeks and the Respondent No.4 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioner after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through his counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within One month thereafter.

4. It is made clear that the Respondent No.4 shall be liable for non-compliance of this order within the stipulated period.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U