Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6983 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-398 Year-2022 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar Son of Motilal Singh R/v- Paharpur, P.S.- Mahua, DistrictVaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 05-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 420, 354, 376, 511, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 IPC was added.

As per allegation in the FIR, in absence of male members of the informant's family, several accused persons including the petitioner knocked the door of the house saying that they all are police personnel. Unknowingly informant opened the door then accused persons forcefully entered into the house and took the thumb impression on stamp paper with a view to grab their land. It is further alleged that on protest made by the ladies member, they assaulted brutally to the mother-inlaw of the informant as a result of which she succumbed to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6983 of 2023(4) dt.05-07-2023 2/3 injuries after 12 days during treatment. Co-accused Veenu Mishra and Uttam Kumar tried to outrage the modesty of the informant's daughter-in-law.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. There is no specific overt-act against this petitioner in respect commission of rape. Deceased had given dying declaration during treatment before the Investigating Officer which is mentioned in para 5 of the case diary in respect of commission of offence, she did not disclose the name of this petitioner and she also stated that she fell down while she was opening the door. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 16.09.2022 Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6983 of 2023(4) dt.05-07-2023 3/3 directed to be released on bail in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 398 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T