Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15903/2019bail granted

Birju Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2019-03-14Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15903 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna ====================================================== Birju Rai (Male), aged about 28 years, S/o Rajdeo Rai, Resident of VillageFanjullahpur, P.S- Baikunthpur, Distt.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar No For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashraf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-03-2019 Let the defect (s) as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be ignored for the present.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 18 litres country-made liquor from the possession of the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 22.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15903 of 2019(2) dt.14-03-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Special Case No.8847 of 2018 arising out of Alamganj P.R. Case No.103 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T