Manish Kumar Mandal @ Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6302 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2018 Thana- RUPAULI District- Purnia ====================================================== Manish Kumar Mandal @ Manish Kumar, aged about 19 years (Male), S/o Sushil Mandal Resident of Village - Ajhokopa, P.S.- Rupali, District-Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 174 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the present case, an allegation has been made that the daughter of the Informant was kidnapped by the petitioner for the purpose of marriage but, the statement of the victim girl made under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. shows that the girl has gone there with the petitioner on her own sweet will. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Manish Kumar Mandal @ Manish Kumar, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6302 of 2019(2) dt.05-02-2019 2/2 court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Purnea in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 174 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T