Ranjeet Raj @ Ranjit Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3784 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

RANJEET RAJ @ RANJIT RAJ Son of Chiranjivi Lal Gupta Resident of Village - Chotta Bariyarpur, Ward No.38, P.S.- Chhatauni, Dist.- East Champaran.

2.

Vinod Kumar Son of Late Sheodaras Das Resident of Village - Bankat, P.S,.- Muffasil Motihari, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indrajeet Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners, who are in custody seeks bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

Allegation is recovery of 86.400 litres of foreign liquor from the car.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioners that petitioners have no criminal antecedents and nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and are in custody since 18.12.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3784 of 2020(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Excise Case No. 434/19 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(4) If the petitioners are found involved in similar nature of offences, after their release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel their bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T