← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19163/2015bail granted

Md. Habib Ansari And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

2015-06-16Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19163 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -261 Year- 2014 Thana -KHAIRA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Md. Habib Ansari son of Sd. Late Suleman Mian, resident of Marbaro, P.S. Khaira, District- Jamui.

2. Md. Mumtaz Ansari @ Laboo son of Md. Kaun Ansari, resident of Garhi, P.S. Khaira, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md.Fahimuddin(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, petitioners are seeking bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 261 of 2014 registered for offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 303, 379, 387, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substance Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

On the day of incident, criminals reached the place of occurrence, committed violence, exploded the bomb and also opened 3 blank fires.

The name of the petitioners was taken by the Police informant except that there is no material against them and they have no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph 3 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19163 of 2015 (2) dt.16-06-2015 2/2 this petition.

In view of the attending facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of U.K.Pandey, Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Jamui in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 261 of 2014, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioners (ii) if the petitioners are found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of their bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) petitioners would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T