Pintu Nat @ Pintu Pahalwan @ Pahalwan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5831 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2024 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Pintu Nat @ Pintu Pahalwan @ Pahalwan Son of Lotha Nat Resident of Village - Chitkohra, Jag Jeewan Nagar, Police Station - Sachiwalaya, District - Patna 2.

Kariya Nat @ Govinda Nat @ Gobind Nat Son of Tuntun Nat Resident of Village - Chitkohra, Jag Jeewan Nagar, Police Station - Sachiwalaya, District - Patna 3.

Bhelu Nat Son of Gyani Nat Resident of Village - Chitkohra, Jag Jeewan Nagar, Police Station - Sachiwalaya, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 235 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of committing dacoity.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are in custody since 13-09-2024. Petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 bear three criminal antecedents each, whereas

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5831 of 2025(4) dt.06-05-2025 2/3 petitioner No.3 bears four criminal antecedents. 5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioners' counsel that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioners are not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioners have transpired during course of investigation. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioners were not put on T.I. Parade. Except confessional statements, there is no material against the petitioners.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioners and manner of petitioners' implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

8.

Let the petitioners be released, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 235 of 2024, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5831 of 2025(4) dt.06-05-2025 3/3 family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T