Patna High CourtCWJC/9209/2017disposed

Madhuri Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-12The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9209 of 2017 ====================================================== Madhuri Kumari, W/o Sahjanand Kumar, R/o Village- Barhapur, P.S. Mokama, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director, State Council of Education, Research and Training, Bihar, Mahendru, Patna

5. The District Magistrate, East Champaran, District- East Champaran

6. The District Education Officer, East Champaran, District East Champaran

7. The Block Development Officer, Dhaka, District East Champaran

8. The Block Education Officer, Dhaka, District- East Champaran

9. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj- Kharua Chainpur, BlockDhaka, District- East Champaran

10. The Mukhiya-cum-Chairman, Panchayat Teacher Employment Unit, Kharua Chainpur, Block- Dhaka, District- East Chamaran .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Lalit Kishore(Paag1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 12-07-2017 In view of the fact that identical writ petitions have been dismissed by this Court and the matter is now sub-judice before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No. 995 of 2017, the petitioner may approach the Hon'ble Supreme Court and seek indulgence into the matter as the question is now subjudice before the Supreme Court.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9209 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Supreme Court to intervene in the pending SLP.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) U S.Pandey/-