Md.Zeyaul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15760 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2020 Thana- PUWAKHALI District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md. Zeyaul Son of Nasiruddin Resident of Village-Mirabhitta, Ps-Pawakhali, District-Kishanganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 13-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the daughter of the informant was married to the petitioner. It is stated that two years after the marriage, the four named accused persons including the petitioner herein started to torture and threaten her and ultimately she was done to death and the accused persons escaped.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations as levelled in the F.I.R. are false and concocted. The petitioner happens to be the husband of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15760 of 2021(3) dt.13-09-2021 2/2 deceased. The relationship between the petitioner and the deceased were very cordial. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. No specific allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 3.5.2020 and charge sheet has been submitted in the case.

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the material on record it transpires that in the postmortem report a number of wounds on the neck, trachea, oesophagus etc. were found to have been caused by hard and sharp heavy weapon. The petitioner happens to be the husband of the deceased.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U