Narayan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3207 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-665 Year-2017 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai ====================================================== Narayan Kumar late Durgesh Prasad R/o Moh.- Nauranga, Patel Chawk, P.S.- Nagar, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Binode Bariar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Nagar P.S.Case No. 665 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 471, 323, 506, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner is that on the direction of the petitioner as director and co-accused Pradeep Kumar as agent of Angela Agro Tech. Ltd. Co., Begusarai, induced the complainant and other persons for investing money on the assurance for making double of the invested money and as such huge amount of money has been collected from the year 2012 to 2014 but nothing returned to the complainant and other investors and after demanding money, the petitioner and other co-accused assaulted and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3207 of 2019(3) dt.04-02-2019 2/2 abused the complainant and other investors.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the petitioner never cheated anybody and the petitioner has clean antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above, the case of the petitioner is concerned, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, Accordingly, prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T