Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6182/2019bail granted

Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-07Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6182 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2018 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar aged about 20 years (M) son of Babu Prasad Mahto Resident of village-Khaira Dargah, P.S.-Rosera District-Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 202 of 2018 registered for the offences punisbahle under Section 25 (1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one live cartridge from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 10.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6182 of 2019(2) dt.07-02-2019 2/2 the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Begusarai, in connection with Khodawandpur (Chhaurahi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 202 of 2018 with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T