Rupesh Vishwakarma @ Pankaj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16116 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== RUPESH VISHWAKARMA @ PANKAJ S/o Suresh Chandra Vishwakarma @ Suresh Chandra Sharma R/o village - Sinduriya, P.S. - Bhavnathpur, Distt.- Gadhwa, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2021 Let the defects be removed within four weeks after start of the physical Court.
The matter has been taken up through virtual Court proceeding.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR of the occurrence of dacoity is against unknown. The petitioner was remanded in this case from some other case on 01.10.2020. However, he was not put on T.I. Parade during investigation of the case.
Submission is that after arrest by the police there is extracted confessional statement of the petitioner before the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16116 of 2021(2) dt.24-07-2021 2/2 police. Investigation of the case against the petitioner is already complete.
Considering the submission aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Aurangabad Town Police Station Case No. 376 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.
(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T