← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2455/2024disposed

Girja Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-22Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2455 of 2024 ====================================================== Girja Paswan, Son of Lakshman Paswan, Resident of Village- Kundiya, P.O.- Kewlakala, P.S.- Dumariya, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Officer-cum-District Magistrate, Gaya. 3.

The District Supply Officer, Gaya.

4.

The Sub. Divisional Officer, Sherghati, District- Gaya. 5.

The Assistant Supply Officer, Sherghati, District- Gaya 6.

The Circle Officer, Dumariya, District- Gaya 7.

The Block Development Officer, Dumariya, District- Gaya 8.

The Block Supply Officer, Dumariya, District- Gaya 9.

The Marketing Officer, Dumariya, District- Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Addl. Advocate General (13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 22-07-2024 Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):- " That this writ application is directed against the order dated 15.05.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Magistrate, Gaya under Supply Appeal Case No. 49 of 2017, arising out of Supply Case No. 17 of 2017.

Further directed to the respondent concerned to restore the P.D.S. Licence of the petitioner under Licence No. 32/2016/24/2007, Kundiya Panchayat, Bhangiya, Block: Dumariya, District: Gaya.

Further prayed that to set aside the supply

Patna High Court CWJC No.2455 of 2024(4) dt.22-07-2024 2/2 appeal no. 49 of 2017 as well as Supply Case No. 17 of 2017."

3. Without going into the merits or demerits of the case, having regard to the fact that the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy of filing a revision under Section 32(vi) of the Control Order 2016. The petitioner is directed to approach the Divisional Commissioner ventilating his grievance within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the revision, the Divisional Commissioner shall pass necessary orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of four weeks thereof. It is needless to mention that before any order is passed, all the parties shall be put on notice and given an opportunity of hearing and submit their objections. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks thereof. Any order passed shall be communicated to all the parties.

4. With the above said directions, the writ petition stand disposed off (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) Bhardwaj/- U