← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8473/2026allowed

Ram Wakil Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-17Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8473 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Ram Wakil Rai Son of Late Bikhan Rai Resident of village -Makasudpur Shahpur, Ps- Shahpur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-02-2026 Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parmanand Prasad, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 103(1), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner, along with others being armed with weapons, arrived and the petitioner ordered to assault, and on his order, other accused persons assaulted the father of the informant, who succumbed to the injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8473 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/2 committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the only role attributed to this petitioner is that of order giving. The petitioner has not made any assault. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 11.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Danapur in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T