Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20680/2016bail granted

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-16Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20680 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2016 Thana -RUPASPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Suraj Kumar, Son of Naresh Chaudhary R/o Haridaspur, PS Rupaspur, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renuka Ratnakar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016, registered under Section 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that Police on receiving secret information about gathering of the miscreants for making preparation to commit dacoity. Thereafter, Police reached near Haridaspur Kali Mandir then miscreants started to flee away, but on chase six persons, including the petitioner were apprhended. On search, petitioner was found in possession of one sharp iron rod and one mobile. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 30.01.2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20680 of 2016 (2) dt.16-05-2016 2/2 petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2016. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M., Danapur in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 23 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T