Rishi Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7883 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2023 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Rishi Kumar Thakur S/o Rajdev Thakur R/o mohalla - Sunderpur Sonar Tola, PO - Lalbag, PS - Vishwavidyalay Campus, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Vyavasaayi Bachat Evam Sakha Swavlmbe Nidhi Limited, through its Director Ajay Kumar S/o Late Vishwanath Rai, R/o vill and P.O. and P.S. - Singhwara, Distt.- Darbhanga ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arvnendra Kumar Thakur, Adv.
Mr. Abhay Kumar Thakur, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Singhwara P.S. Case No. 178 of 2023, registered for offence under Sections 420, 406, 409, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. It is alleged that this petitioner received money from the loan holder in his personal account, which was to be deposited in the account of informant's company namely "Vyavasayi Bachat Evem Shak Swawlambi Nidhi Limited Singhwara" at Darbhanga, but the petitioner did not deposit the aforesaid amount in the account of informant and thus, embezzled the same.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7883 of 2025(2) dt.04-03-2025 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. He further submits that petitioner has paid all the amount received from different loanholders and no amount is due to be paid.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific and direct allegation that he received amount from the loan-holders in his personal account, but did not deposit the said amount in the account of company and thus, misappropriated the said amount.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T