Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1162 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2019 Thana- KARPI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== SATYENDRA YADAV, Son of - Nanhe Yadav, Resident of Village- Keyal, Mahaveer Ganj, Keal, Keyal, P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Spl. PP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2021 Let the defects be removed within four weeks. Heard the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 18.12.2020 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge cum Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Jehanabad in Karpi (Sahar Telpa) P.S. Case No. 187 of 2019 registered under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Submission is that the appellant is not named in the F.I.R. of the occurrence of murder of the father of the informant rather others four are named in the F.I.R.. Name of the appellant

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1162 of 2021(2) dt.24-03-2021 2/2 surfaced during the course of investigation. Appellant is in custody since 26.08.2020. Investigation of the case is already complete.

Considering the lack of direct material against the appellant, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions: (a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U T