Bhikhari Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7595 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-602 Year-2018 Thana- Siwan Muffasil District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Bhikhari Yadav Son of Timal Yadav 2.

Rajesh Yadav Son of Timal Yadav 3.

Pappu Kumar Yadav @ Pappu Yadav Son of Garju Yadav 4.

Kamlesh Yadav @ Kamlesh Son of Dwarika Yadav All the above are resident of Village - Bhatwalia, P.S. - Siwan (M), District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Tiwary Mr. Arbind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, A.P.P.

Mr. Gautam Kumar Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3.

04-04-2019 Heard Sri Ravindra Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel assisted by Sri Arbind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, Sri Rajendra Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Gautam Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the informant.

Four petitioners, apprehending their arrest in Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 602 of 2018 registered for offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of bail in the event of their arrest or surrender.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7595 of 2019(3) dt.04-04-2019 2/2 It was submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that the injuries, shown to be caused by petitioners, were not grievous in nature. It has also been argued that there is no allegation against the petitioners regarding falsely obtaining huge amount from the informant and others. He has also argued that petitioners are having clean antecedent. Accordingly, a prayer has been made for granting anticipatory bail. However, on going through the F.I.R. itself, which suggests that petitioners were participants with main accused, there is no reason to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J.) anay U T