Naga Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3480 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-764 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== Naga Chaudhary Son of Mahesh Chaudhary Resident of Village - Gulani, P.S.- Chandauti, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 764 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar amended Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

04 liters country made liquor is said to have been recovered from the open fields under bush behind the house of the petitioner.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that mandatory provision of Section 100 Cr.P.C. has not been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3480 of 2020(2) dt.29-02-2020 2/2 followed with respect to search and seized. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarge on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya in connection with Excise Case No. 764 of 2019 on the following conditions: "(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) mdrashid/- U T