Bijendra Prasad @ Bijendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
(From The Official Chambers Via Video Conferencing) CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16212 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2020 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== BIJENDRA PRASAD @ BIJENDRA RAM S/O SHIVDAS RAM R/O VILLAGE GHATRAIN PS MADANPUR DISTRICT-AURANGABAD. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rakesh Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-01-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State assisted by the learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 506, 354(A), 354(B), 504, 453, 380, 307, 427 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation, 19 accused persons named in the FIR along with 50-60 unknown persons came to the house of the informant variously armed with lathi, danda etc. The accused persons levelled allegation against the informant that the informant party had concealed the nephew of Naresh Bhuiyan in their house. They attempted to enter into the house of the informant and on protest they badly assaulted and dismantled the household articles
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16212 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2022 2/2 and took Rs. 20,000/-. Co-accused Amarjeet Kumar and Sonu Kumar also outraged the modesty of the informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name was figured only in the reinstatement of the informant. By drawing my attention towards the order of Additional Sessions Judge-IXth, Aurangabad dated 14.12.2020, it was argued that the injuries are simple in nature. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad in connection with Madanpur P.S. Case No. 77 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) SONALI/- U T