Ranjeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18420 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2016 Thana -NTPC District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Ranjeet Singh, Son of Jaldhar Singh, Resident of Village Chakraja, P.S. Rasalpur, District - Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with N.T.P.C. (Kahalgaon) P.S. Case No. 06/2016 registered for offences under sections 341, 307, 386, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation has been made of demanding the extortion money and indiscriminating firing. The petitioner has been shown to be involved in the indiscriminating firing. From the spot one empty cartridge was also recovered.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the brother of petitioner is facing criminal case and the informant himself is carrying number of criminal cases over his head. The petitioner has been roped in the present case on account of the fact that he having qualification of ITI, has been appointed in N.T.P.C.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18420 of 2016 (2) dt.05-05-2016 2/2 Nabinagar as an Apprentice.

This Court only looking to the prospect of the petitioner about his selection grants bail to him. The petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur in connection with N.T.P.C. (Kahalgaon) P.S. Case No. 06/2016, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be father of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

The letter dated 12.02.2016 issued by Summeta Roy, Dy. Manager (HR) N.T.P.C., Patna be kept on record. Mahesh/- (Shivaji Pandey, J) U T