Vishal Patel @ Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14861 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2023 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== Vishal Patel @ Vishal Kumar S/O Raju Patel @ Raju Prasad @ Raju Ravat R/O Village- Paterhi, P.S- Maharajganj, Distt.- Siwan (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akshansh Ankit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 263 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 504, 506 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Prosecution case in short is that co-accused including the petitioners have assaulted the grandson of the informant by various means, due to which he succumbed to injury.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14861 of 2024(3) dt.25-06-2024 2/2 It is submitted that petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that there is delay of one day in lodging of the FIR.

5.

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. It is submitted that there is specific allegation of giving sword blow to the grandson of the informant against the petitioner. 6.

Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, there being direct allegation against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7.

Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T