Chiranjivi Sagar @ Chiranjivi Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1886 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -167 Year- 2013 Thana -BAJPATTI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Chiranjivi Sagar @ Chiranjivi Bhagat Son of Sri Vindeshwar Bhagat resident of Village - Hajpurwa Basant, P.S. - Runnisaidpur, District - Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 22-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
The name of the petitioner has appeared in the confessional statement of Bikash Jha and Ranjeet Kr. Jha and later on the petitioner has also made confession. It is submitted that accused Bikash Jha has confessed that he shot dead the deceased. During investigation it has also come to light that Bikash Jha was identified by the witnesses. There is no other material against the petitioner. It is further submitted that in similar facts and circumstances accused Santosh Jha has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. no. 37926 of 2014.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is involved in many cases. After investigation,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1886 of 2015 (3) dt.22-06-2015 2 / 2 the case has been found true against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pupari (Sitamarhi)/court concerned in Bajpatti P.S. Case no. 167 of 2013/Tr. No. 1265 of 2014 after framing of charge with the following conditions :
1. One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.
2. The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the court.
4. In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) sudip/- U T