Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1970 of 2024 ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh S/O- Jodha Ray, Resident of VillageBhagwanpur, PS- Baruraj, Block and Circle- Motipur, District Muzaffarpur, presently - elected ward member, ward no.-15, Gram PanchayatMahammadpur Mahmada, PS- Baruraj, Block and Circle- Motipur, District - Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar Patna.
2.
The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial, Area Development Authority (BIADA), having office at Udhyog Bhawan, Bakarganj, Patna, Bihar800004 3.
The General Manager, Bihar Industrial, Area Development Authority (BIADA), having office at Udhyog Bhawan, Bakarganj, Patna, Bihar800004 4.
The Deputy General Manager, Bihar Industrial, Area Development Authority (BIADA), Muzaffarpur Cluster having Head Office at Udhyog Bhawan, Bakarganj, Patna, Bihar- 800004.
5.
The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.
6.
The Sub-Registrar Motipur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. 7.
The Circle Officer, Motipur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Suraj Narayan Yadav, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate For the State :
Mr. P.K. Shahi, Advocate General Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the BIADA :
Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 09-02-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn
Patna High Court CWJC No.1970 of 2024(2) dt.09-02-2024 2/2 with liberty to approach the authority under the Bihar Land Encroachment Act. We make it clear that we have made no observations on the merits nor on the locus standi or maintainability of such a petition, which the authority under the Act will decide in accordance with law.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Rajiv Roy, J) kiran/neha/- U