Umapati Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.903 of 2017 IN Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 3131 of 2014 =========================================================== Umapati Devi, wife of Sri Madan Kumar, Resident of Mohalla: - Bari Tola, Mahadewa, P.O. + P.S. : - Buxar, District - Buxar. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Collector, Buxar.

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Buxar.

4. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Buxar.

5. The Child Development Project Officer, Brahampur, Buxar.

6. The District Welfare Officer, Buxar.

7. Madhuri Devi, W/o Sri Sunil Kumar Sinha, Resident of Baritola, Police Station Buxar Nagar, District - Buxar.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bipin Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Amish Kumar, AC to AAG-8 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 29-11-2017 None appears for the applicant.

2. The defect(s) pointed out by the office has not been rectified, even though repeated times are being granted since 07.07.2017.

3. We have gone through the record and heard Shri Amish Kumar, learned counsel for the State.

4. Challenge in this appeal filed under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is only to an order passed on 24.03.2017 in M.J.C. No. 3131 of 2014, which was an application for review of an order

Patna High Court LPA No.903 of 2017 dt.29-11-2017 2/2 earlier passed on 09.01.2013 by a Bench of this Court in Civil Review No. 438 of 2012 and Civil Review No. 438 of 2012 was for review of an order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5819 of 2010.

5. Neither the order dated 09.01.2013 passed in Civil Review No.438 of 2012 nor the original order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 5819 of 2010 are impugned in this appeal.

6. That being so, only against the order passed on 24.03.2017 in M.J.C. No. 3131 of 2014, this application is not maintainable, until and unless the orders passed in Civil Review No. 438 of 2012 and C.W.J.C. No. 5819 of 2010 are also impugned.

7. Accordingly, we find that this appeal is not maintainable and this appeal stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date08.12.2017 Transmission Date NA