Sakaldeep Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5012 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3008 Year-2018 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.
Sakaldeep Ray Son of Late Vanshu Ray Resident of Village - Bilandpur, P.S. - Mahua, District - Vaishali 2.
Lalmuni Devi Wife of Sakaldeep Ray Resident of Village - Bilandpur, P.S. - Mahua, District - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Saroj Devi Wife of Gonu Ray Resident of Village - Bilandpur, P.S. - Mahua, District - Vaishali. Present address/ Nahiyar Address - Saroj Devi, Daughter of Nanhak Ray, Resident of Village - Bhadhwas, P.S. - Mahua, District - Vaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 3008 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 341, 324 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Prosecution case, in brief is that the petitioners and co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the complainant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5012 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 2/3 mentally and physically and ousted her from the matrimonial house due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry as Rs. 1 Lakh and a motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of the complainant. They are separate in mess and property. Petitioners have no concern with the alleged occurrence. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent in which they are on bail.
5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 3008 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5012 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 3/3 under section 482 of B.N.S.S.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/- U T