Veerchandra Paswan @ Veerchandra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15916 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2020 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali ====================================================== Veerchandra Paswan @ Veerchandra Paswan S/o Shiv Narayan Paswan @ Shivnarayan Narayan Paswan R/o- Village- Bakhari Doa (Mahjidia) @ Bakhari Dua Gadhi Chowk, P.S.- Goraul (Kathara O.P.), District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Goraul (Kathara OP) P.S. Case No.216 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15916 of 2021(2) dt.07-01-2022 2/2 present case. There is no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather 1053 liters of Indian made foreign liquor has been recovered from a hut. The petitioner has got no manner of concern with the hut where the liquor was recovered. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Having considered the fact that 1053 liters of Indian made foreign liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T