Raghu Rana v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28582 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2011 Thana -IMAMGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Raghu Rana, son of Ganga Rana @ Gajo Rana, resident of Village - Bhelwara, P.S. Muffasil, Dist - Hazaribagh (Jharkhand). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 11-08-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown. Nothing has been found against the petitioner in the main case diary. In the supplementary case diary, the allegation against the petitioner that the stolen mobile has been used by him and on that basis, his name has appeared. He has been in custody since 25.02.2015, but up-till-now, no T.I.Parade has been held. However, after investigation, charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the witnesses. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The learned counsel for the State submits that a dacoity has been committed in the Panjab National Bank and a huge amount has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28582 of 2015 (2) dt.11-08-2015 2/2 been looted.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Sherghati, Gaya/court concerned after framing of charge in Imamganj P.S. Case No.47 of 2011 with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T