← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/585/2021disposed

Pankaj Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Anjani Kumar,

2022-06-22Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.585 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1333 of 2020 ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Ray Son of Sri Vivekanand Ray, Resident of Village-Ramnagar P.O. Sedahan P.S. Tarari, District Bhojpur at Presently Posted as Niyojit Teacher, Upgraded Secondary School Motha, Karakat District Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Anjani Kumar, the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Anjani Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, The Director, Department of Human Resources, Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Ansu Kumar, The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.

5.

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram. 6.

Surendra Prasad, The Deputy Development Commissioner cum Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Rohtas at Sasaram. 7.

Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, The District Education Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. 8.

Mr. Suresh Prasad, The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Rohtas at Sasaram.

9.

Mr. Nathuni Paswan, The Chairman, Zila Parishad, Rohtas at Sasaram. 10.

Mr. Nathuni Paswan, The Secretary cum the Chief Executive Officer, Secondary/Higher Secondary Teacher/Librarian Niyojan Samittee, Zila Parishad, Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Harsh Anuj, Advocate For the Opposite Parties :

Mr.Madanjeet Kumar (GP 20) Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, AC to GP 20 For Zila Parishad :

Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for violation of the order dated 2101.2020 passed in CWJC No. 1333 of 2020.

Patna High Court MJC No.585 of 2021(3) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 The aforesaid order of this Court has been complied with. If the petitioner feels aggrieved by the order, he may move the appropriate forum in accordance with law. This contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U