Jai Nath Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13049 of 2017 ====================================================== Jai Nath Ray S/o Late Ram Jeevan Rai, Resident of Village- Bari Pahari, P.S.- Agamkuan, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.
Director, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Collector cum District Magistrate, Patna. 4.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.S.C.Yadav - Gp15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.
2. The present application has been filed:
to issue a writ in the nature of MANDAMUS/ CERTIORARI or any other writ or direction commanding the respondents to pay the compensation of acquired land following the provisions contained in section 24 to 30, 40, 69, 80 & 96 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 30 of 2013 [Here in after mentioned as "The Act"], And Further the petitioners prays for direction to respondents to return / refund the total amount to the tune of Rs. 65743/- deducted as Income Tax contrary to the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13049 of 2017(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/2 provision contained in section 96 of "The Act" as well as letter / circular no. 36/2016 dated 25.10.2016 [Ann-10], And Further the Petitioner prays for direction to respondents to enumerate the market value of land as on the date of implementation of "the Act" i.e.1.1.2014 as mentioned in The Act as well as under letter dated 26.10.2015 & 4.12.2015 [Ann-5 & 6], And Further prayer to pay the additional compensation of 75% as per section 40 (5) of the Act as well as letter dated 7.12.2016 [Ann-8] because the land has been acquired under emergent provisions, And Further the Petitioner prays for direction to pay the amount @12% per annum as contained in section 30 (3) of the Act, And Further prayer for direction to respondents to pay the interest u/s 80 of the Act and be further pleased to issue any further direction/ directions to the respondents in view of the facts and circumstances of this case.
3. Since no one appears for the petitioner, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U