Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8009 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2023 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vinod Yadav, Aged about 23 years (Male), S/O- Rajnath Yadav, R/O- Jadopur Shukul, P.S.- Jadopur, Dist.- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Devashish Giri, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 12-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Jadopur P.S Case No. 203 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.
3. As per prosecution case, total 95.2 litres of liquor was recovered from the bags.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition, also submits that petitioner has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 8009 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/2 arrested at the spot and he is in judicial custody since 27.12.2023.
5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail after framing of the charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cumSpecial Judge Excise-I, Gopalganj in the connection with Jadopur P.S Case No. 203 of 2023.
7. However, the trial court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of this order. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/ Brajesh/- U T