Bali Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1716 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Bali Das son of Ucheshwar Das, resident of village- Jamua, P.S.- Belhar, District- Banka.

2.

Pappu Das, son of Biseshwar Das, resident of village- Pasia, P.S.- Belhar, District- Banka.

3.

Sanjay Das, son of Ghutar Das, resident of village- Pasia, P.S.- Belhar, District-Banka.

4.

Kam deo Das, son of Late Saryug Das, resident of village- Pasia, P.S.- Belhar, District-Banka.

5.

Jaggannath Das, son of Late Darogi Das, resident of village- Pasia, P.S. Belhar, District-Banka.

6.

Subhash Das, son of Late Dina Das, resident of village- Pasia, P.S. Belhar, District- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Minor Water Resources Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Banka.

3.

The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Bhagalpur. 4.

The Superintending Engineer, Minor Irrigation Circle, Bhagalpur. 5.

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Banka. 6.

The Superintendent of Police, Banka.

7.

The Sub-divisional Officer, Banka.

8.

The Assistant Engineer, Minor Irrigation Sub-Division, Bounsi, DistrictBanka. 9.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Belhar, District- Banka. 10.

The Circle Officer, District- Banka.

11.

The Officer-in-Charge of Belhar Police Station, District- Banka. 12.

Mrs. Ankur Enterprises, at and P.O.- Pradhanchak, Police Station- Khaira, District- Jamui.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Yogesh Kumar, AC to SC-9 For the Resp. No. 12 :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AC

Patna High Court CWJC No.1716 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2025 2/2 to SC-9 for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondent no. 12.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ application with liberty to pursue their representation filed before the Collector, Banka.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U