Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18908/2016dismissed

Md. Naushad Alam @ Md. Naushad @ Nasiya @ Naso v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-26Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18908 of 2016 (3) dt.26-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18908 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -153 Year- 2015 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ====================================================== Md. Naushad Alam @ Md. Naushad @ Nasiya @ Naso S/o Late Tauhid, resident of Village- Mirzapur Vardah, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2015 in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No.153 of 2015 pending in the Court of SDJM, Munger (Sadar) registered for the offence under Sections 489(A), 489(b), 489(c), 420, 120(B) and 124(A)/34 of the IPC and Sections 16, 17, 18, 20 and 22 of the UAP Act. As per the prosecution case, it is a case of recovery of huge number of counterfeit notes by the accused persons. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2015. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering of evidence against the petitioner. The total amount of Rs.1,35,000/-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18908 of 2016 (3) dt.26-05-2016 Indian currency is said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, out of which, Rs.1,00000/- is alleged to be counterfeit notes, as per the report submitted by the State Bank of India. Petitioner had no knowledge in respect to the counterfeit notes.

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR and he is involved in a number of cases.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail, the same is rejected for the present.

(Sudhir Singh, J) B.Kr./- U T