← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13554/2024bail granted

Deepak Kumar Das @ Deepak Das @ Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-06Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13554 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-433 Year-2023 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Das @ Deepak Das @ Guddu S/o- Ram Yatan Das R/oVillage- Jainagar Rajputani Tola, P.S.- Jainagar, Dist.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 3.420 liters of liquor from the house of the petitioner apart from 360 liters from a mango orchard and 9.09 liters of liquor from two motorcycles parked near the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13554 of 2024(2) dt.06-03-2024 2/2 was recovered from his conscious possession and after amendment in the Excise Act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with, it is next submitted that the house is a joint family property and as such it cannot be alleged with certainty that it was the petitioner who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was in the knowledge of the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 433 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Arish/- U T