Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5051/2026bail rejected

Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5051 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-409 Year-2025 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar S/o Deoki Mahto Resident of villageKoshala Bagi, P.S.-Nardiganj, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arjun Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No.409 of 2025 lodged on 17.11.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 109, 117(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 which is pending before the Court of J.M.-1st Class, Nawada,

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against the four named accused persons including the petitioner with allegation that the accused persons assaulted the informant and his son by iron rod due to which injury has been caused to them.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5051 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that due to dirty village politics, a false and fabricated case has been lodged against the petitioner.

5. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is not clean and there is one criminal case pending against him in which he is on bail.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and injury has been caused to the informant and his son.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U T