Vibhuti Yadav @ Vibhuti Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5764 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2017 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== Vibhuti Yadav @ Vibhuti Kumar Son of Late Shobhit Yadav Vill.- Biratpur, P.S.- Basopatti ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Anr Bihar 2.

Kabita Devi wife of Pappu Yadav Resident of village- Dorbar, ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with C.R. Case No. 221 of 2017, T.R. No. 2711 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 379 , 354 (B) and 498 (A) of the Indian Penal Code. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner, who is maternal brother of the husband of the complainant/opposite party No. 2, is of subjecting the complainant with cruelty due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is living separately and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5764 of 2019(3) dt.28-03-2019 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with C.R.Case No. 221 of 2017, T.R.No. 2711 of 2017, to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T