Vikky Chaudhary @ Biky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7333 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2024 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Vikky Chaudhary @ Biky Kumar Son of Kishori Chaudhary Resident of Vill- Neyamatganj Chakalau, Ward No. 7, P.S.-Mehsi, District- East Champaran, Motihari 2.

Sanjay Chaudhary @ Bhola Son of Shiv Mangal Chaudhary Resident of Vill- Neyamatganj Chakalau, Ward No. 7, P.S.-Mehsi, District- East Champaran, Motihari 3.

Sandeep Chaudhary @ Sandeep Kumar Son of Vinod Chaudhary Resident of Vill- Neyamatganj Chakalau, Ward No. 7, P.S.-Mehsi, District- East Champaran, Motihari 4.

Bharat Chaudhary @ Bharat Kumar Son of Indal @ Indra Chaudhary Resident of Vill- Neyamatganj Chakalau, Ward No. 7, P.S.-Mehsi, DistrictEast Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 127(1), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons including these petitioners abused informant and on protest all the accused persons assaulted informant by means of knife, sword, etc. as a result of which informant sustained

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7333 of 2025(2) dt.20-02-2025 2/2 injuries.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that on account of land dispute, free fight took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Motihari, East Champaran in Mehsi Police Station Case No. 119 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T