Raju Chaudhary And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5603 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2018 Thana- CHANPATIA District- West Champaran ======================================================
1. RAJU CHAUDHARY, son Binod Chaudhary R/o village- Kuriya Kuti, Pasi Dhangar Toli, P.S- Chanpatia
2. Guddu Chaudhary, son of Jadu Chaudhary R/o village- Kuriya Kuti, Pasi Dhangar Toli, P.S- Chanpatia
3. Akhilesh Chaudhary, son of Jadu Chaudhary R/o village- Kuriya Kuti, Pasi Dhangar Toli, P.S- Chanpatia
4. Basant Chaudhary, son of Ashok chaudhary R/o village- Kuriya Kuti, Pasi Dhangar Toli, P.S- Chanpatia
5. Binod Chaudhary, son of Yadolal Chaudhari @ Jadulal Chaudhary R/o village- Kuriya Kuti, Pasi Dhangar Toli, P.S- Chanpatia
6. Manoj Paswan, son of Srinarayan Paswan R/o village- Kuriya Kuti, Pasi Dhangar Toli, P.S- Chanpatia
7. Fulena Dhangar, son of Late Lochhan Dhanger R/o village- Kuriya Kuti, Pasi Dhangar Toli, P.S- Chanpatia ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2019 Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 282 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 149, 307, 353, 337, 338 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioners and other accused persons is of pelting stones and bricks upon the police party during course of raid and causing injuries to them. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that altogether 14 named accused in this case and no specific
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5603 of 2019(2) dt.31-01-2019 2/2 allegation has been attributed against any of the petitioners and petitioners have clean antecedent.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners, rather petitioners to surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order and, if possible, to be disposed of on the same day. With the above observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T