Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21365/2016bail granted

Md. Manouar @ Mansoor v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-20Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21365 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -345 Year- 2015 Thana -CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- SARAN ====================================================== Md. Manouar @ Mansoor, son of Taslimuddin @ Md. Taslim Resident of Village- Digauri Ghat, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Malay Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.M.K.Gautam(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 345 of 2015 registered for offences under sections 467, 468, 399, 402, 471, 472, 420, 489(Ka), (Kha), (Gaa) and (Anga) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)A, 26/35 of the Arms Act. As per allegation made in the First Information Report, the police received information about planning of committing robbery. The police went to the house of Yogendra Yadav, search was made and from there the one country made pistol, cartridges, fake currencies, color printing machine etc. were recovered. From the possession of the petitioner only one mobile

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21365 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016 was recovered.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Md. Manouar alias Mansoor, be released on bail on 1.6.2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 345 of 2015, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T