Jay Ram Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4981 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2024 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Jay Ram Yadav S/O Late Fulena Chaudhari @ Late Fulena Yadav R/O Village- Kawlachak Paschim Tola, P.S- Vijaipur, District- Gopalganj. 2.

Indrawati Devi W/O Jay Ram Yadav R/O Village- Kawlachak Paschim Tola, P.S- Vijaipur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 304(B) / 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that sister of informant was married with co-accused Mukesh Yadav on 29.05.2023 and it is alleged that after some time of marriage, informant received an information that his sister was lying unconscious and when informant went to matrimonial house of his sister, he saw that his sister was lying dead. Informant suspects that due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry, all the accused persons including petitioners killed his sister.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4981 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 2/2

4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation. As a matter of fact, the deceased committed suicide. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate - VI, Gopalganj in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T